Dual-core Yitong T910 Eton looks like a classy JiaYu G3


Are you looking for a phone which looks like an upmarket, thinner JiaYu G3 but with a lower specification, smaller battery and higher price? No of course you’re not which is a shame as the Yitong T910 Eton is one great looking Chinese phone.

Costing 1599 Yuan ($252) and equipped with a 4.5 inch screen (960 X 540) and a battery of just 1700mAh the Yitong T910 is nearly double the cost but with a lower worse screen and smaller battery than the JiaYu G3 which is a shame as for the design it’s a great looking phone.

Gizchina News of the week


It seems Chinese phone designs have really found their style now and are going for much angular designs when compared to foreign brands, which is evident here with the T910 and also with the boxy JiaYu G3. The Chinese media say that these designs are much more manly than the swooping lines of phones like the S3 or Xiaomi M2, but personally I’m not a fan.

The rest of the specification for the YiTong T910 reads much like similar dual-core MT6577 phones available today, meaning a 1GHz XPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB ROM and an 8 mega-pixel rear camera. The T910 also supports dual-sim and will work on China Unicom’s WCDMA / GSM networks.

Source

Disclaimer: We may be compensated by some of the companies whose products we talk about, but our articles and reviews are always our honest opinions. For more details, you can check out our editorial guidelines and learn about how we use affiliate links.

Previous HTC One X+ Specification Announced
Next Carpad F6 6 inch Phablet on sale with Note Style Stylus

4 Comments

  1. October 2, 2012

    You say “”The rest of the specification for the YiTong T910 reads much like similar dual-core MT6577 phones available today, meaning a 1GHz XPU””

    but it’s 1Ghz CPU.

    😉

    • Amper
      October 3, 2012

      don’t be petty…

  2. Gapinho
    October 3, 2012

    @Yeow: it’s a typo, not worth mentioning.

    Design looks nice, but that’s all I can say before someone get it in his hands.

  3. RobertNL
    October 3, 2012

    Looks great, but indead misses specs.