Chinese Android phone maker Star have released the quad-core MT6589 StarS5 Butterfly phone, but rather than producing an all new an unique design have chosen to clone the HTC Butterfly.
Gizchina News of the week
As the name suggests the StarS5 Butterfly is a 5-inch HTC Butterfly clone which boasts similar black and red styling but at the more wallet friendly price of $222.99. Like most of the 2013 Star line-up, the S5 packs Mediatek’s MT6589 quad-core processor, 5-inch display and Android 4.2 Jelly Bean as standard.
The 5-inch panel is a 720p HD unit to help keep costs low, and there is 1GB RAM, but the phone still supports dual-sim support, SD card memory expansion plus a 3 mega-pixel front and 8 mega-pixel rear camera.
If you fancy getting your hands on the quad-core, StarS5 Butterfly then head over to Uredeal where they are currently listing the phone in stock.
[ Source ]
What I want to know is why all chinese phones use the MT6589 proccessor on 1.2ghz?
Why dont they use qualcom 1.5ghz like xiaomi mi2?
Well…I had a bad experience with this brand and decided NEVER buy a Star phone again. I had one Star A2000 with lcd bug…I simply lost it after 2 months of use.
Totally agree. I bought a Star A1000 (hd7 clone) and the screen was a torture to use. Since then I see first youtube reviews. Anyway, although 200 bucks to another cell phone is cheap for a Star phone is a very risky and expensive bet IMHO.
There at least three different companies making Star branded phones. They all started out as the one company, but in time they split in different companies. For example, one of these companies is Ulefone/Shenzhen Star Technology Co/Gotron who make phone know as Star or iStar brand.
You’re right Roger about Ulefone though I thought Gotron don’t make smartphones? They appear to make TV related devices/accessories?
Ulefone don’t seem to have any kind of web presence whatsoever which is strange these days.
I saw a review of this phone on youtube and the camera is 6MP not 8MP or 12 MP as advertised
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=rfef5VblDL8#t=679s
The camera was 6 megapixel – because it is set to take a pictures in 16:9, normally, it should be 8 mpix:)
This is probably correct as the similar Star/HDC X920 and UMI S1 can be found listed with 8MP rear and 5MP front but cropped to 16:9 they may be correctly listed as 6MP and 4 MP as the full sensor image is being cropped from 4:3 to 16:9.
The decal on the back for 12:0 will be interpolated/extrapolated 16:9 image i.e. not a lie just marketing fluff.