This morning we received the FAEAF1 Penguin for review, we’ve already put together an unboxing video along with photos of this low-cost device here.
We have high hopes for FAEA, which is why I was pretty excited when I received the FAEAF1 Penguin this morning from the official international distributors Faeamobile.com.
Although I knew the phone was on it’s way I didn’t actually no what was going to be in this morning’s package until I tore open the box and got inside. There I found the large cardboard packaging which house the FAEAF1 Penguin.
You can see a brief hands-on and hear my initial impressions of the phone in the video below, but in case you can’t watch it now I’ll tell you what I though here. Opening up the packaging and upon getting in the box you will find the phone, 2000mAh battery, charger and data transfer cable, there are no earbuds.
Removing the rear panel, which seems to have been manufactured in the same 2 step injection moulding process as the Meizu MX2, is a little trickier than usual thanks to a tighter, more snug fit (a good thing). The rear panel also holds the built-in NFC chip.
Gizchina News of the week
Under the cover is space for an SD card and their is an odd shape SIM arrangement which I have yet to play around with.
The front of the phonefeatures a 4.5-inch 720p (1280 x 720) display, capacitive buttons (which don’t light up) and a 2 mega-pixel front camera.
FAEA F1 Penguin specifications
I have yet to run Antutu on the phone, but according to the official FAEA F1 Penguin specifications the phonefeatures a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 8225Q quad-core processor, 1GB RAM, 8 mega-pixel rear camera, 4GB of memory, 2000mAh battery, Android 4.1.2 and support for GSM 900/1800/1900 mhz+ WCDMA 900/2100MHz.
A full reviewFAEAF1 Penguin will review should be posted by the end of next week.
Watch the FAEA F1 Penguin unboxing video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2ZKHhCQrJM
Faea F1 scores 10100 on Antutu versus 11800 for example iOcean X7! That shows the difference between the Mediatek MTK6589 SoC and Qualcomm MSM8225Q SoC. Of course it’s Cortex A7 versus Cortex A5 as well and different gpu. And then there’s different resolution and screen sizes, but still.. it’s nice to see how the Qualcomm Snapdragon holds up to the Mediatek MTK! 🙂
It doesnt.. The Antutu score also takes into account many factors including memory, storage and Screen resolutions. The Faea F1 is only a 720p screen whilst the iOcean is a 1080p screen. There is as much as 25% differences between the 720p and 1080p since most of the MTK6589 @720p phones hit around 13-14k. The Snapdragon on the FAEA F1 is the bottom of the range Snapdragon 200 so dont think it is anything like the high end Snapdragon 600 range of the Galaxy S4.
Thats true. But still after reading about some Wifi/GPS issues it’s nice to have some alternative to MTK. On the other hand Snapdragon 200 may be more battery unfriendly. I prefer perfect functionality (GPS,Wifi) than some +25% (10k vs. 14k Antutu numbers) speed. (Now I am fine with some 5000 Antutu of my UMI X1)
Wifi gives me only 2 out of 4 bars but its still a solid signal and stays solid when im on the terrace whereas my newman n1 tends too loose teh signal on the terrace.
For the GPS, first fix took a few minutes (about five). After that it took just a few seconds to get a fix the second time…. seems very good. Im very impressed by this phone after a week of use.
Thanks for answer. Well that’s exactly what I expected. Fair results in Wifi and GPS. I had enough of praying for GPS on my UMI X1. Wifi is also nothing special and disconnecting in weak signal. I was hoping for massive improvement with MTK 6589. But it looks like only small step ahead (I had 2 MTK 6589 phones in hand so far). I was waiting for Jiayu G4, but now I am really confused. I guess most of the people here are focused on dual SIM support (Its somehow connected with China phones) than it is price and after that maybe unique design. But what for is MTK’s thousands of Antutu rating, when some important functionality is missing ? Maybe for gamers. My wifes Sony Experia TIPO with shity parameters on the paper but on the other hand GPS and WIFI on Qualcomm chipset are from another league and Android 4.0.4 is very well balanced while only 512 MB of RAM and under 1GHz single core on board.
That’s still OK at the price point, UK side you would be lucky to get a Samsung Galaxy Ace, or a Sony Experia Tipo sim free for the same coin as an F1