Ahead of the weekend we received the Ulefone Be Touch, and while you guys wait for the full review we thought you might like to see the benchmarks from this flagship smartphone to keep you going.
The Ulefone Be Touch is an exciting device! It’s the first of the ‘big 3’ flagships we have been waiting to review, and it’s a phone that really takes your breath away when you get it in your hands. We simply were not expecting the Be Touch to feel so well made! Anyway more of the build in the full review this weekend, for now let’s take a look at the benchmarks.
A 64bit Mediatek MT6752 processor is at the center of this flagship. The processor also gets the benefit of 3GB RAM and only has to handle the pixels of a 720HD display rather than a FHD panel which should give it a head start over the Elephone P7000.
UleFone Be Touch Benchmarks
- Antutu: 43,412
- Ice Storm Extreme: 6,745
- Nenamark 2: 72.0fps
- Geekbench Single-core: 800
- Geekbench multi-core: 3455
- Vellamo Metal: 1291
- Vellamo Mulitcore: 1884
- Vellamo Browser: 3401
- GFX Manhattan: 715.1
- GFX Manhattan offscreen: 370.5
- GFX T-Rex: 1,142
- GFX T-Rex Offscreen: 702.9
- Quadrant: 16,411
Ulefone Be Touch Benchmarks – Conclusion
I’m currently running the Be Touch on Android 5.0 using the latest build which was updated via OTA last week. The system on my phone is smooth, nippy and so far stable, but Yash has reported that his version of the phone is a little on the slow side (although I am not sure he is on the same build as me).
Gizchina News of the week
Most recently I personally reviewed the Asus Zenfone 2 and I can see that in certain benchmarks the Ulefone Be Touch out performs the Intel powered 4GB RAM phone. The Be Touch does better in Antutu, Geekbench and Quadrant. However, when the phone is required to get the GPU going we see the Zenfone is miles ahead in graphical performance scoring 18328 on its FHD panel compared to just 6745 on the HD Be Touch screen.
For an MT6752 phone though the benchmarks are about spot on. Similar to the Mlais M52 which also has a 720p display, the Ulefone Be Touch gets 6,745 in 3D Mark Extreme (the M52 managed 6840). That said we reviewed the M52 on Kitkat so we were hoping that the Lollipop build of the Be Touch would bring a little extra to the table.
We’ll look out for more OTA update from Ulefone which might get a little extra from the phone. In the meantime what do you think of the Ulefone Be Touch Benchmarks? Keep posted for the full review this weekend.
The Be Touch is available on Geekbuying now for $199.99.
[ Ulefone ]
So far with the new 64 bit chips GPS has been excellent, I would expect the same from this one.
I remember reading that the buttons on the last ulefone were wobbly and broke easily, is there anything like that that sticks out?
Avoid this brand, they release every week a flagship phone. And they never update their phone with new software. The screen resolution is slow that’s why its getting higher score.
my mistake i was talking about the Elephone.. but this news is about Ulefone. Thanks for clearing it up
How can a screen resolution be slow? Perhaps you meant low? 720p isn’t the best but it’s not the worst either, it’s just about the middle for displays.
Ye you obviously work for a rival company…
Slow resolution, ha!
andi what’s the battery like?
The design n build quality are superior than those of jiayu s3. Speaker is on the bottom rather than backside. on the other hand, s3 has 1080p screen, led notification, more sensors, better camera(i guess), better developer support n cheaper also. Do you want to add something?
Yes.
You just think this have a better build quality because it so appears on external layout because materials used should be more durable, wile you don’t really know what is used inside for peripheral components. I have bunch of old plastic smartphones, never bricked a single one. S3 have a stereo speakers. You know Jaiyu is proven & quality brand, you also know everything is working as it should on S3, no miss functioning in sensor area or falling apart after period of time it’s present on market. Developer suport will also make it a long lasting one. Think all of this makes it a better & secure choice. Only problem with S3 Is a slow charging.
P’s I am not working for Jaiyu. ???
Let’s wait for the review then. 🙂
My Review:
Quaility: really good.
Soundspeaker: bad
GPS: takes 30 seconds
Performance: good
Screen: ok für 720P
Finerprint: works not always
Camera: like a average 5 MP cam (ghosting and to soft in the edge)
Speaker is also bad along with camera? 🙁
Have you received it? Fingerprint only need 0.1S,
SO FAST!
“I have bunch of old plastic smartphones, never bricked a single one.”
What does the material of the phone have to do withing bricking it? A bricked phone has nothing to do with what the phone is made of.
Point actually whose to show how it hasn’t have much with it.
Phones become bricked from flashing ROMs or rooting (among other Software related things). They can also become bricked from hardware malfunctions it has nothing to do with what your phone is made of. It can be made of titanium alloy and still become bricked.
I think it’s obvious I ment physically broken but I also ment & various hardware malfunctioning like any out of SoC external components. So I used term bricked. Big deal.
Now now you are a big boy so you know root don’t have nothing to do with people flashing bullshits. You also know how their is more than one line of security off bad flashes from recovery that is on separate partition with separate kernel to ADB.
I don’t consider boot loop’s & various other software problems in “bricked” category as they are repairable in 99% of case’s including & eMC partition table corruptions. Who’s & repair service guy as I whose & kernel developer. We just use terminology different.
It wasn’t obvious what you meant at all. In the phone community the term “bricked” has an actual meaning. Whether you consider something bricked or not, it is still a term that is used industry wide. And the build material has nothing to do with it.
I don’t think so. ulefone is big manufacturer in China. They have focused on OEM service in the past 10 years. I think quality is OK.