7'

Snapdragon 820 powered LeTV LeMax Pro scores 133,357 on Antutu

AndiDecember 14, 2015

More insane Antutu scores today as the next generation LeTV LeMax appears with benchmarks over 133,000.

LeTV are fast becoming our odds on favourite to be the first Chinese phone maker to release a phone with a new Snapdragon 820 chipset. A few months back an early teaser from the company had mentioned an 820 SoC, and more recently the company had told us that we can expect a huge announcement from them in the coming weeks, now this!

Gizchina News of the week

Join GizChina on Telegram

The benchmark shown here are believed to be from the upcoming LeMax Pro, an updated version of the flagship phablet. The benchmarks show the phone running a 5.5 this time around though, with 2K resolution, Android 6.0, 4GB RAM and 64GB internal memory. Specs details go on to show a 21 mega-pixel rear camera and 4 mega-pixel front.

As for the benchmarks results, you can see them broken down in detail above, but the overall score is an incredible 133,357 points! How will this compare to upcoming Xiaomi, Vivo, and Oppo models?

Disclaimer: We may be compensated by some of the companies whose products we talk about, but our articles and reviews are always our honest opinions. For more details, you can check out our editorial guidelines and learn about how we use affiliate links.

About the author
Andi

- - M_kaya
    December 14, 2015
- Manu
  December 14, 2015
  depending on how many versions they make, for example if they release 3 phones like this year and this will be the main phone (like the one pro, x600) it should be 500~600€ … but depending on its name x910 (letv max 2?) it should be 600~800€

Rob
December 14, 2015
Let the battle begin.
Nolan
December 14, 2015
This SoC is giving me orgasms. Either this, or the Ex8890 will be my next upgrade (I’ll go with the one which has uniformly higher AnTuTu and other synthetic scores).
- jonscravit
  December 14, 2015
  New version of antutu number scores is very big
  It is much greater than previous version
  It should be tested on the old also
  - Nolan
    December 14, 2015
    You are right. As long as it crosses 75,000 on old AnTuTu, I’m happy. My criteria for 2016 is this: I will buy a phone which has either:
    (a) Score higher than 75,000 in old AnTuTu (preferably 80,000+)
    (b) or Score higher than 130,000 in new AnTuTu
    This is the true benchmark of a phone’s raw power – everything else is secondary.
    - balcobomber25
      December 14, 2015
      - Nolan
        December 14, 2015
        I had a feeling you would reply along similar lines, and MaxPower is also probably lurking around the corner, waiting to jump in and start menstruating on how AnTuTu scores are flawed, and how your supreme understanding of SoCs, performance, statistics etc. entitles you to the opinion that the these numbers don’t matter, TO YOU, and it shouldn’t matter to ANYONE ELSE, in your ongoing efforts to educate the crowd.
        It’s a lost battle, really, and you (or anyone else for that matter) will never make a significant difference to the consumers. People love AnTuTu, people love bragging rights, all websites INVARIABLY tout AnTuTu scores upfront – in fact, it’s the first thing everyone asks for and mention when dealing with upcoming flagships. Terrible, isn’t it? Deal with it.
        Also, I want to start by saying that I wouldn’t wipe my ar.se with your (now very stale) opinion, advice or counter-arguments – feel free to enlighten your incredible audience on this disqus thread and the GC forums – I’m sure it’s a philanthropic effort worth your time.
        For one thing, 75000 against a score of 65000 (on similarly spec’d devices, i.e. same resolution, same SoC) *could* indicate a more optimized Rom, or well integrated HW/SW or better drivers.
        While the difference may not be perceivable in day to day tasks, like making calls, texting, skype etc., the difference will be perceivable in intense gaming, or any app that is more compute intensive than regular apps.
        Whether or not someone needs that sort of computing power is a good question indeed – and that’s why we have options – a fragmented market with devices for every need.
        I’m a lover of bragging rights, and I find it comforting to know that I own a device which has significant computing power, and I can afford it too without skipping meals (not to sound money-wise arrogant, but that’s the truth).
        So, why should I, with the money, and the longing for the best specs and best indicative score, settle for a device which has 10,000 points less than what I’ve set as my personal target for 2016? Because MaxPower and BalcoBomber25 on GC say so?
        Don’t make me laugh.
        balcobomber25
        December 14, 2015
        The question has nothing to do with computing power it has to do with meaningless numbers on a test which manufacturers have already shown they can cheat on. A score of 75,000 and a score of 65,000 means absolutely nothing other than one is a higher number.
        Nolan
        December 14, 2015
        Your opinion, not a fact – and in any case, like I said, I wouldn’t wipe my ar.se with it. So there…..
        balcobomber25
        December 14, 2015
      - balcobomber25
        December 14, 2015
        Problem is people need a way to justify their device is the best, they need a cold hard metric they can point to so they can brag to all their friends. That is what Antutu provides them.
        “I got 75,000 you only got 74,998, My phone is so much better than yours!!!!!!”
        Muhammad Yasir
        December 14, 2015
        which , imo , is entirely pathetic and proves that imbeciles still exist 😀
        balcobomber25
        December 14, 2015
        It’s the same with every consumer product. Car enthusiasts compare 0-60 (0-100) times, gamers compare FPS.
  - Roberto Tomás
    December 14, 2015
    pretty sure the 820 dev tablet was tested on antutu 5.7 … and scored somewhere around 80k
shmox
December 14, 2015
And you can sell your kidney to buy this
Snapdragon 820