Xiaomi announced the Redmi Note 3 Pro on the 14th of January, 2 days after launching the Redmi 3.
The Redmi Note 3 Pro is a bit of an upgrade to the Helio X10-powered Redmi Note 3, which is also why it is 100 Yuan dearer than the former.
Let’s take a look at the Redmi Note 3 Pro specifications.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro Specifications
Model | Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro |
SIM Card | Dual SIM |
Color | Silver, Gray, Gold |
Capacity | RAM: 2GB/3GB ROM: 16/32GB |
Language | Multi Language |
Chipset | CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 hexa-core |
System | MIUI 7 (based on Android 5) |
Screen | Display size: 5.5-inchesGizchina News of the weekResolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels |
Cameras | Rear: 16 mega-pixel, f/2.0Front: 5 mega-pixel, f/2.0 |
Network and Wireless Connectivity | 4G FDD LTE : B1 / B3 / B7 TDD LTE: B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 3G WCDMA : B1 / B2 / B5 / B8 TD-SCDMA: B34 / B39 CDMA: BC0 2G GSM: B2 / B3 / B8 WIFI : 802.11b/g/n (2.4GHz) |
Battery capacity | Non-removable 4050mAh |
Dimensions | 150 x 76 x 8.7 mm |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro Pricing
The Redmi Note 3 Pro is priced starting at an attractive 999 Yuan for the 2GB RAM/16GB ROM version in China, which translates to roughly $150. This is 100 Yuan over the 899 Yuan asking price of the Helio X10-powered Redmi Note 3.
Pricing for the 3GB RAM/32GB ROM version is yet to be announced.
Pricing for 3GB+32GB is 1119CNY (182$).
The bands are the same except CDMA2000 support is added, the bands are listed on their site.
I see no change in Xiaomi adding FDD B20 800 MHz band for Europe. Is it a financial issue (patents etc.) ?
They don’t sell in Europe yet, they are using the bands they need to in the markets they are actually present. Why they aren’t expanding faster, no clue…
They would need an additional certification, so why bother when they sell only in region where there is no B20.
Updated:
4G FDD LTE : B1 / B3 / B7
TDD LTE: B38 / B39 / B40 / B41
3G WCDMA : B1 / B2 / B5 / B8
TD-SCDMA: B34 / B39
CDMA: BC0
2G GSM: B2 / B3 / B8
They should add SD card support in second simm slot at least. That will make it more desirable by more people.
WoW, this is a super deal.
Xiaomi are firing on all cylinders here!
They really aim to destroy the competition in the local market.
Looking forward to a review for Redmi 3 and Note 3 Pro
Damn, just ordered the mediatek version as it looked like the Sd version didnt come any time soon…
It just shipped out, no possibility to cacel now…
Would defintely like this version more.
I feel sorry for you. SD 650 is going to be killer mid-range SoC of 2016.
Yeah, not sure what do yet..
Might try to sell it for the price I bought it once the Pro is out for real, its definetely a better deal than the mediatek one. Im more a fan of Quallcomm actually but decided to give mediatek a go, not knowing a new phone, the exact same one but with a powerfull Snapdragon was coming.
Wow…I really want this.
Fingerprint Scanner- ✔
New CPU- ✔
Unibody- ✔
Metallic- ✔
See MediaTek..this is what happens when you delay the Helio x20
Maybe true but all the same..MediaTek should have released the Helio x20 at the beginning of the year. I’ve been waiting for over 7 months for that cpu..Originally set to arrive by Dec 2015 now its Feb 2016
It’s actually January 14 on Earth and the X20 is not a direct competitor to this one. But it will come, this is just the start of a year that will make all 2015 high end devices look silly.
BTW which cpu wins in the gpu department?The Helio x20 with its Mali T880MP4 or the Snapdragon with its Adreno 510
No idea how the SD650 does on the GPU side since it’s likely crippled a bit vs SD652. An even more important aspect is how hard it will throttle. If after 15 mins of gaming it drops to half the FPS or it can do better than that. So we’ll have to wait for proper tests. The X20 does have the process advantage so there is a good chance it will do better but it can’t really be as cheap as the SD650 and it is much faster in CPU perf.
Hiawei has MP4 on 16ff at 900MHz and they throttle very little , Mediatek on 20nm goes to 700MHz and usually they keep power consumption in check, not pushing clocks too high for the GPU to not be able to sustain them so it is likely the GPU won’t throttle.
As for SD650/652 i am optimistic too as i assume the GPU is a somewhat minor upgrade over SD801 and it will behave in a similar way thermally.
MediaTek has always placed 2nd tier gpu’s on their flagship cpu’s. The Helio x20 gpu is actually alot weaker than 2013’s Snapdragon 800..Anyone looking to do heavy game on 1440p with the Helio x20 is going to be very disappointed.
That’s rather ignorant and makes you sound like a fanboy.Others are using huge GPUs that can’t work at advertised speeds and only do well in benchmarks. Opinions like yours are enabled by poor testing,with sites only running stupid benchmarks that have value at all since in real gaming the behavior is very different.
Mediatek doesn’t oversize the GPU and offers something that works as advertised. The same honest and sane approach as Apple or Huawei’s latest SoC. They find a rational balance between perf,power and costs. In the very high end, one cold go crazy on costs but Mediatek is yet to address that segment, we’ll see what they do with the X30.
As for your claim vs SD800 ,that’s just not true.
That’s rather ignorant and makes you sound like a fanboy. Others are using huge GPUs because they push fps without issue unlike the cheap GPUs chosen by MTK. They overclock cheap hardware that burns battery and cheat benchmarks to make it look like a good competitor but when that benchmark gets updated, MTK looks as cheap as it really is. X10 was benching around SD808 last year, now the updated Antutu shows it 20k down as it really is. X20 was supposed to come long ago but now everyone is going with 650 series. MTK is done in the mid-range.
lovely trolling
now eat this http://images.anandtech.com/doci/9330/gpu-throttling_575px.png
@ Karly Johnston
You said everything about yourself by using Antutu.
You are a big fat clueless noob,
You need at least 5 more years to qualify for this conversation. See you then.
It is true..The MT6797 (Helio X20) manages 95.2 gflops While the Snapdragon 800 manages 129.6 gflops. Now Gflops are raw values computed from actual hardware not benchmarks
Go here to see more http://kyokojap.myweb.hinet.net/gpu_gflops/
or arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/08/snapdragon-820-is-official-a-look-at-its-gpu-and-how-much-the-chip-matters/
The X20 is up 2x faster than the SD800 and ofc supports a lot more features and newer standards.
But you seem to be here just to bash Mediatek and have no interest in facts or reason.
Am critical of MediaTek’s decision to continually use poor GPU’s on their flagships. The rest of their CPU is very impressive but I am a gamer
there is a cost, the GPU is big (die area wise) and you have a thermal limitation so to gain perf you need to go with a much larger GPU and clock it lower while gaining little. But you can’t waste mm2 on that in midrange or lower high end since you need to be competitive in the market place. In the very high end you can do it to get top spot and sell you SoC at 50-60$. Even then you compete with Samsung or Qualcomm and they clock their GPUs way too high and can’t sustain those speeds.So if you do a honest SoC you end up behind in those benchmarks even if you beat them in sustained gaming.
Look at Huawei with T880MP4 at 900MHz they almost match the Galaxy S6 in sustained perf. Samsung has T760MP8 at 700MHz but the clocks drop to half after 15mins of load while Huawei throttles very very little. Huawei should have went with MP6 i think and MT in the X30 better go MP6 or even MO*m we’ll see.but the X20 is not really aimed at very high end, it’s a bit bellow that.
MediaTek should have clocked the Helio x20’s 700Mhz to 900Mhz matching the Kirin 950. Then we would have had a really good gpu in possibly one of the best CPU’s this year
Kirin 950 is on 16ff , X20 is on 20nm so Kirin has a big power advantage and if Meditaek would clock the GPU that high it simply could not sustain those speeds and would throttle. You would only gain a few minutes of higher speeds and after that it would have to throttle down to sustainable clocks. But that’s not cool, to deceive the consumer like that.
They could do it right and offer boost clocks. Advertise it at 700Mhz with boost to 800MHz, making it clear that the boost clock is just short term. Kinda like Nvidia in PC GPU.
MTK will have the x30 on 16ff this year and we’ll see what that one has to offer. The x20 is somewhere between SD652 and SD820 and the X30 should try to go after SD820.
Spreadtrum will have something on 16ff this year too, could be interesting.
Adreno 510 is better when we’re talking for the gpu, but the cpu in Helio X20 can easily smash the SD650.
Not soon, but second half of the year might be.