In the countdown to their launch at MWC, Zopo have release further specification details of the flagship Zopo Speed 8.
It was previously revealed that the Zopo Speed 8 would be among the first phones to sport a Mediatek Helio X20 chipset, fingerprint scanner, and a metal chassis, the company have now confirmed further parameter details.
The press release sent out today mainly focussing on camera specifications but it also repeated that the Speed 8 will have Android 6.0, while revealing the Helio X20 will be paired with 4GB RAM and a 3600mAh battery.
Gizchina News of the week
Camera specs are an 8 mega-pixel camera on the front and a Sony IMX230 21 mega-pixel camera on the rear, PDAF (Phase Detection Auto Focus) should ensure fast focus speed, but it remains t be seen what lens, lens coating and camera optimizations Zopo have in place to ensure the 21MP shooter is really on par.
Zopo will be officially launching the Zopo Speed 8 at MWC on the 24th February, Keep posted for more details.
My Yutopia’s camera fares really well with same camera specs…have to watch out for this…
O yes….a bit buggy but camera algorithms are really good…my phone actually take great photos for a f 2.2 aperture
You can’t just go by the sensor. The problem is the only thing they ever list is the sensor (and the added features like OIS, PDAF, Laser etc). Two phones with the same exact sensor can have drastically different results. The choice of Lens and the software optimization can mean more to the end results than the sensor choice.
Yea and that is what I’ve said…I will not judge this zopo so early….will have to wait how zopo designs it’s image processing algorithms
I concur. My wife and I both own a Galaxy S4 running different android versions. The picture my wife’s S4 takes are far better than those shot with mine S4.
Hope they put a decent amount of ROM memory in the device too. To me, decent is 64 GB.
Not more then 16GB is really needed as long as the phone has an SD card slot.
You are right. However they’ve been charging us the same price for that much storage space for years, which is absurd considering how much price/storage ratio falls every year.
I would rather have 64GB than 16 and an SD card.
I need dual sim also, so I hope it won’t has a hybrid sim tray.
Until this last year I never used Dual Sim but now that I split my time between Thailand and the US it is a must. So much more conveninant to never have to fumble with SIM’s (which I always lost), just get off the plane, top up and I’m good to go.
I’m greedy and needy so I get both 64gb+SD.card reader I love having space to spare gives you like a nice piece of mind somehow. I have a 32gb SD with about 9gb used and from the phoned 64gb I have 39gb or so left empty.
I prefer SD card. The advantage is that if I change my phone, I just swap the card and I’m ready to go. I have a 64GB card full of music, pictures, videos and maps.
But I understand that internal storage is faster and if somebody doesn’t have as much data as I do, it is more convenient to have them in internal memory.
I keep all my important info backed up with Google Drive. That way i don’t have to worry about my new phone having an SD card or not.
That is unfortunately not a good option in Europe. Using data in other country is very expensive, data limits are tough and signal coverage of fast internet quite poor.
Using cloud storage is clearly the future. But it isn’t here yet.
Depends where you live in Europe. I do all my uploading over WIFi. The only place in Europe I haven’t been able to find a wifi connection (fee or free) was the French countryside and the mountains. Even rural areas of Ukraine I found wifi signals.
You usually have no problems to find a WiFi especially in cities. The problem appears if you want to access your data at certain place, where the connection isn’t available. For example if I’m on a business trip in Germany, I have no access to internet the whole day until I get to my hotel.
So it s a good idea to have offline maps, music, photos (if I want to show them to my colleague) etc.
With 64GB of storage you have plenty of space to store that stuff you need on your device and keep non essential stuff in the cloud. But I travel around the world for business, including Germany, I never have any issues finding a wifi signal outside my Hotel. Even in third world countries in Africa I can find a signal.
16Gb isn’t going to cut it if your current device has 32Gb. And, for me that’s important.
Quick question. Can the ultra fast focus times that PDAF provides supplant the need for OIS?
These are 2 technologies which doesn’t have anything in common. PDAF is a technology for very quick autofocus. OIS improves shaking during video reroding and allows to take pictures without bluring them even in bad light conditions. But if you have a f2.2 OIS camera, it will perform similarly to a f1.8 camera without OIS in low light conditions.
It is possible, but having OIS and PDAF would be a benefit to most users. Personally OIS isn’t a huge need for me, but I can understand why others would want it. If I had to choose between the two I would take PDAF.