Brand spotlight – Vernee

I don’t want to offend Martin Fabian, but here I try to point out the errors that I found. {PS: I am not a native-English speaker, so do my best as well}{additions in [ ], things to delete in () }

“…its mark on the [ground] and (the) announced…”

“…Not surprisingly [a] company [that is] Shenzhen based…”

“…With access to [a] strong R&D team…”

“…(namely) (mainly) the Mediatek one…” {one of those words is too much}

“oh, totally a trustworthy article, now I’m very trustful toward this company and I will surely buy some of their products” – No One Ever

Well, it’s OK to see photos from Vernee offices they have a quality inspection laboratory!!, I bet Elephone doesn’t have one.

Sometimes is good to know about the brands before we buy something, I’ve seen a lot of videos on YouTube of people showing their offices and way to work.

Excuse my English, I don’t speak English, just spanish.

Sorry, but if you make the circuit of the phone tech sites on any given day you will see much of the same news. Companies send out press releases and sometimes they get lucky and the news in the press release gets published.

Duh, people.

Nice to see that Vernee has some muscle behind them but the proof is in the pudding.

I don’t want to offend Martin Fabian, but here I try to point out the errors that I found. {PS: I am not a native-English speaker, so do my best as well}{additions in [ ], things to delete in () }

“…its mark on the [ground] and (the) announced…”

“…Not surprisingly [a] company [that is] Shenzhen based…”

“…With access to [a] strong R&D team…”

“…(namely) (mainly) the Mediatek one…” {one of those words is too much}

i feel some bias in some of the comments below even though i can understand them somewhat, ive seen similar articles for samsung,motorola etc and no one says they are Ads, i have a question for you all is it even possible for any of you to read an article about a new company and not feel like its an Ad?

when on sites like andriod authority the history of motorola is an article how is it not an Ad then? lets say this article about the history of vernee what possible history could this new company have that is comparable, isnt this then appropriate?

what if this entire atricle only had a negative tone, and had a doubtful tone towards the company would people say it is an Ad then? maybe not because then it would match up to many people’s feelings

This article appears to be a repackaged press release and not any legitimate news. Deidre (previous gizchina writer) used to do the same, usually for doogee or ulephone products. Articles such as these come across as biased and unbalanced, with little done to verify the info or quality control.

my personal opinion about this, it’s to show customers this brand is not a fake one or would disappear in maybe half years, to show up a proof that could make people not worried before purchase. the point is that we gotta be await when Vernee ship their first load of smartphone out and see how people consider and talk about their brand by using their products. no matter what we read here, we should be objective to this.

I am very tempted to buy their entry level Thor. I have seen it for around $120 online and I could always use a new burner phone for travel and what not.

For everyone who says that Vernee own’s Elephone, you are mistaken. New Bund own the factory that made the P8000 (among other phones for other brands), Vernee is their own brand (think of them as a tiny Foxconn).