Samsung’s latest Exynos 8895 chipset seems to have been spotted in a benchmark result over on GeekBench. Samsung’s notoriously known for shipping their devices with two different SoCs depending on the markets. But thus far we’ve mostly focused on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 version, which from previous leaks we know scored 1929 points in single-threaded tests and 6084 under multi-core loads.
Well, how does the Exynos 8895’s Samsung Galaxy S8 compare to it then? Let’s have a look at its score.
Knowing Samsung’s naming scheme we can safely assume the device in the benchmark is a Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus with 4GB of RAM (the 6GB version is said to be available only in China). By looking at the mere numbers, it’s obvious the Exynos 8895 outperforms the Snapdragon 835 by few points in single-core operations and slightly more in multi-core loads.
Gizchina News of the week
In the graph above we can also see how the Samsung Exynos 8895 scores more than the Huawei Mate 9 with the Kirin 960, the multi-core king up until now.
Either way, we only have to wait a few weeks to finally see one of the most awaited and leaked phones of the past years. What do you guys think about these scores? Which version would you get had you the option, Exynos or Snapdragon?
SD 4 Life … Mofo!!! Screw Samsung…
exynos beat SD ass pretty bad
the exynos s7 has way better battery life than the sd version, US customers are fucked lol, long live the European exynos version
The kirin version …
Nope, Kirin 960 turned out to be horribly bad put to silicone.
“Kirin 960 turned out to be horribly bad put to silicone”
how so ?
and what does ‘put to silicon’ means ?
I mean employed rooting with used cross elements & liberty’s on used 16nm FinFET TSMC proces, that usually means how it’s put on the silicone.
So so…
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11088/hisilicon-kirin-960-performance-and-power/4
& take a look at page 5 to see disaster.
But for real, is the mate 9 really that good? Wow! But following previous trends, the S6 with Exynos processor was way better than the SD 810 powered devices, last years S7 with the Exynos though slightly lower in bench marks was faster in apps launching and running than the SD820 ( at least that’s what most reviews comparing the two reported. (correct or forgive me)) so am a bit biased towards the Exynos version. But we’ll just have to wait n see.
SD 4 Life … Mofo!!! Screw Samsung…
exynos beat SD ass pretty bad
the exynos s7 has way better battery life than the sd version, US customers are fucked lol, long live the European exynos version
Exynos … i need money tho
The kirin version …
Nope, Kirin 960 turned out to be horribly bad put to silicone.
“Kirin 960 turned out to be horribly bad put to silicone”
how so ?
and what does ‘put to silicon’ means ?
I mean employed rooting with used cross elements & liberty’s on used 16nm FinFET TSMC proces, that usually means how it’s put on the silicone.
So so…
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11088/hisilicon-kirin-960-performance-and-power/4
& take a look at page 5 to see disaster.
But for real, is the mate 9 really that good? Wow! But following previous trends, the S6 with Exynos processor was way better than the SD 810 powered devices, last years S7 with the Exynos though slightly lower in bench marks was faster in apps launching and running than the SD820 ( at least that’s what most reviews comparing the two reported. (correct or forgive me)) so am a bit biased towards the Exynos version. But we’ll just have to wait n see.
Just give me a phone that has a good processor (SD801 0r 805 would do), an OS that isn’t battery hog, and most importantly, a camera setup that can compete with the likes of Samsung and LG (an IMX260 or 362 sensor with 1.7 aperture, OIS, good lens, manual mode with RAW DNG capture, long exposure shots as long as 5 minutes, and the most important, a Lumia-like camera software algorithm). I’m sold!
You don’t mind screen quality?
Exynos … i need money tho
Just give me a phone that has a good processor (SD801 0r 805 would do), an OS that isn’t battery hog, and most importantly, a camera setup that can compete with the likes of Samsung and LG (an IMX260 or 362 sensor with 1.7 aperture, OIS, good lens, manual mode with RAW DNG capture, long exposure shots as long as 5 minutes, and the most important, a Lumia-like camera software algorithm). I’m sold!
You don’t mind screen quality?