Sony PS5 beats the Microsoft Xbox Series X in almost every way

Wow. 2-3 rumors and you already know the console war winer. How is a bigger SSD a key area compared to better GPU?

Microsoft will use GPU accelerated ray tracing which is very taxing so they need a powerful GPU and on the other hand sony will use dedicated ray tracing hardware separated from the main GPU hence doesn’t need to equal Xbox .

If GPU performance gap is not that big (like 1 TERAFLOPS) then sony gonna dominate in that department too.

Sony won’t have any money left to actually complete the PS5 if they keep paying for all these articles to be written. #sponseredcontent

what can you expect from a guy who plays in the dirt all day

It’s really sad that articles like this pass for news and show up in my google news feed.

Um. So may I point out that when it comes to as game running and looking better the gpu is what it’s about. Ps5 will load faster with more ram and better ssd… but will it look better??? I’m fine with a game taking 1 to 2 seconds longer to load if the fps is higher.

Wait is he really saying Faster RAM and Storage beats a faster GPU?

“Some guy on Twitter said a thing, better make an article about it pretending it’s even remotely close to fact!”

This is bad “journalism.”

Game pass ultimate, xCloud (which I’m playing this week here in Canada), Accessible Controller for those with physical disabilities. My guy, Microsoft is bringing it’s A+ game here and everyone who’s gonna set the Series X aside is gonna be in for surprise.

edit: it’s Microsoft, come on now.

If you know anything and I mean anything about transfer rates, they are not referring to PCIE AT ALL, this is SSD tech vs HDD which in that instant will have 0 effect on the frames and performance of your games while you are playing anything. If we are referring to PCIE speeds and latency between the CPU and GPU based on how the SoC is setup that AMD created for the consoles that is 1000000% a different conversation, but the assumption is that the layout will probably be the same with the performance going to Microsoft, or them being on par in performance based on leaks and rumors. There are even benchmarks showing little difference, depending on the game, for PCIE 3.0 vs 4.0 if you look things up online. The only way that an an HDD would be terrible is if it failed, BUT an SSD can and will fail over time as well, SSD are moving towards the future with better NVME technology but it’s very expensive, both companies, yes don’t included, will not be putting a 300 dollar NVME SSD inside there consoles because the SOC itself is probably 60-80% of the cost of the entire thing, and if the rumors are real that it’s going to be on par with graphics cards around the 500 dollar mark, there is no way In hell either company can do anything to put them in and sell at a decent price, it’s actually impossible without the idea of loosing profits. Please do research before you comment because you’re not helping anything at all lol….

So what you saying is 2080ti with Sata 3 SSD is way worse experience than 2060 with Nvme? 🙂

The only thing is, you are the only person on the internet that thinks the difference will be only one teraflop

This. The longest loading game on console is GTA5. 95% of all other games put you in game ready to play in 30-60 seconds. I’d much rather have my game look pretty than load quickly, within reason of course. Nobody has final specs and yet we have all this speculation and even what is speculated here is completely wrong. Sony is paying big bucks to convince console owners that load speeds are crucial here when in reality they’re not bad already. I’ve literally heard nobody on console wishing for a faster loading game before it looking better and having higher FPS, two things a larger capacity SSD won’t affect.

You should all embarrassed to publish anything like this.

It’s quite sad that THIS kind of garbage “reporting” gets ANY traction. Until Sony AND Microsoft release “official” specs, nothing should be considered worthy of reporting.

Dear “Author” of this terrible article, please stop writing and go back to your sandbox.

Faster RAM can have a benefit, but faster storage is meaningless once you’re already using an SSD which both consoles are. Unless Sony’s SSD has a monstrous dram cache that can be loaded up with the game instantly to then run off of that RAM I would not expect to see any real world performance boost at all.