Ulefone is clearly trying to market the Future model as capable of competing with the real heavyweights in the design and performance and while the specs are surely respectable, I’m not sure how valid is this try because such phones are usually on a totally different level, but Ulefone is certainly not afraid to make such comparisons.
The latest one is a direct video battle with the Samsung S7 Edge and one of the interesting categories could be the camera one, because the Future uses 16 MPix Samsung sensor itself. In the design maybe the Future stand a chance too with its bezel-less design, but the performance battle is lost from the beginning, because even tho Helio P10 with 4 GB is good, it can’t compete with the latest Exynos in any universe.
Gizchina News of the week
Of course based on the video Ulefone comes to the conclusion there are not any significant differences between the two phones and that the Future display is actually better than the Samsung AMOLED with too warm colors. Well everybody is entitled to an opinion, but in this case it’s probably the marketing talking right?
Anyway check out the video and see for yourselves.
Ulefone employees spamming the comments section in 3… 2… 1…
more like spamming the coments in 123
You may be mistaken. That’s what UMI often do, not Ulefone phone. Uleofone is not UMI. UMI often do craps, while Ulefone products, though not top-level, are generally not bad.
Ulefone employee spamming the comment section attacking umi even when it’s not involved it’s a new thing, those guys never cease to amuse us!
Errr, except UMI employees, every body says UMI is shitty, so i don’t know which attack is from Ulefone.
Xaxaxaxaxaxaxa – they compare it to Galaxy S7 … omfg.
Why ulefone now follow Elephone ??? They just make themselves looks really stupid.
The only thing better between ulefone and Samsung S7 is lower price, put stop.
No need to say about hardware or software specs. Samsung S7 is far above them.
The video doesn’t show anything at all!
When will the ulefone future will bd release ?
At least Karel was a bit more objective this time regarding how to present the AD… I mean ARTICLE
Maybe he is finally listening to all of our criticism? And you had it right the first time with AD.