MT6595 powered Alcatel One Touch D820 with QHD display gets benchmarked


Hot on the heels of compatriots such as Vivo and OPPO is Alcatel, international wing of China’s TCL with a smartphone that touts (you guessed it)… a 2560 x 1440p aka QHD display.

Found on the GFXBench database earlier today, the Alcatel One Touch D820 is a smartphone that is expected (or not?) to feature a rather generous QHD resolution on a small-ish 4.6-inch screen. If true, the One Touch D820 will require you to be a superhuman in order to discern between pixels, because they’re going to be packed insane tight. A quick calculation returns a figure of 638ppi, something so high, it’ll hurt your eyes.

The fact that the device is listed with a QHD display sort of speaks volumes, and that it is going to be a flagship. For that, Alcatel have included 3GB of RAM, 16GB of internal storage, and a MediaTek MT6595 processor that should not only give it some much needed power under the hood, but also keep costs low thanks to mass manufacture and other factors.

Gizchina News of the week


See:Details of 3 upcoming MediaTek LTE processors

Other than that, this super phone is expected to feature Android v4.4 KitKat out of the box (quite a win when you consider the chipset that’s powering it) and LTE support of course.

Even though GFXBench says the rear camera is a 7 mega-pixel sensor, we’re told it usually underestimates camera resolutions. We’d put our money on a 13 mega-pixel sensor at least; even anything above that shouldn’t be a surprise considering trends from the recent past.

alcatel

[Via]
Disclaimer: We may be compensated by some of the companies whose products we talk about, but our articles and reviews are always our honest opinions. For more details, you can check out our editorial guidelines and learn about how we use affiliate links.

Previous UMi Cross prices dropped in China to $160
Next DOOGEE DG800 Valencia Review

27 Comments

  1. auhauah
    June 15, 2014

    hey djow!!

  2. Guest
    June 15, 2014

    hey djow!!

  3. Nik
    June 15, 2014

    Now this is something I was looking for! High specs in a small form factor!

  4. desponent
    June 16, 2014

    7MP back camera? Somehow I doubt the spec is legit.

  5. The Chosen One
    June 16, 2014

    Isn’t the MediaTek MT6595 an Octa Core with big. Little confirguration?

    Benchmark lists quad core!

    • June 17, 2014

      Might it be that the benchmark is “pulling” just the Cortex A17 cores?

      Aka doesn’t support that config.

      My 2 cents

  6. Nik
    June 16, 2014

    Now this is something I was looking for! High specs in a small form factor!

  7. desponent
    June 16, 2014

    7MP back camera? Somehow I doubt the spec is legit.

  8. Sven
    June 16, 2014

    confused about the use of qhd recently with the previous qhd (540*960). couldn’t they come up with a new name or what’s the deal here?

    • Nik
      June 16, 2014

      That was ‘qHD'(Quarter HD) with a small Q, This is ‘QHD’ (QUAD HD). But yeah, It can be confusing..

      • Sven
        June 16, 2014

        thanks for enlightening me here Nik 🙂

  9. The Chosen One
    June 16, 2014

    Isn’t the MediaTek MT6595 an Octa Core with big. Little confirguration?

    Benchmark lists quad core!

    • Yetimania
      June 17, 2014

      Might it be that the benchmark is “pulling” just the Cortex A17 cores?

      Aka doesn’t support that config.

      My 2 cents

  10. Sven
    June 16, 2014

    confused about the use of qhd recently with the previous qhd (540*960). couldn’t they come up with a new name or what’s the deal here?

    • Nik
      June 16, 2014

      That was ‘qHD'(Quarter HD) with a small Q, This is ‘QHD’ (QUAD HD). But yeah, It can be confusing..

    • Sven
      June 16, 2014

      thanks for enlightening me here Nik 🙂

  11. Anon
    June 16, 2014

    Actually the screen is 6″ . And i hope it is a 8MP quality back camera than 13MP bad , interpolated one.

    • desponent
      June 16, 2014

      Because there are only bad interpolated 13MP camera around.

      • Anon
        June 16, 2014

        Interpolated = bad. Creating fake pixels just to increase the resolution = bad. Lowering the quality just for a number war = bad. Yes, there are only bad interpolated 13mp camera around. Oppo Find 7 method to increase the photo resolution is quite good but that isn’t regular interpolation…

        • desponent
          June 16, 2014

          I see that you’ve tried every 13MP phone camera in existence and concluded that it’s worse than 8MP phone camera.

          Silly shit people say just to feel that they “win” a conversation.

  12. fake
    June 16, 2014

    Fake specs! 7MP camera with 8294400 pixels total??? There are no 4,6″ QHD screens, the smallest one is 5,4″

    • June 16, 2014

      wrong specs are obviously the fault of the benchmark app.

  13. Guest
    June 16, 2014

    Actually the screen is 6″ . And i hope it is a 8MP quality back camera than 13MP bad , interpolated one.

    • desponent
      June 16, 2014

      Because there are only bad interpolated 13MP camera around.

    • Guest
      June 16, 2014

      Interpolated = bad. Creating fake pixels just to increase the resolution = bad. Lowering the quality just for a number war = bad. Yes, there are only bad interpolated 13mp camera around. Oppo Find 7 method to increase the photo resolution is quite good but that isn’t regular interpolation…

    • desponent
      June 17, 2014

      I see that you’ve tried every 13MP phone camera in existence and concluded that it’s worse than 8MP phone camera.

      Silly shit people say just to feel that they “win” a conversation.

  14. Guest
    June 16, 2014

    Fake specs! 7MP camera with 8294400 pixels total??? There are no 4,6″ QHD screens, the smallest one is 5,4″